From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:211]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CB57788B for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KPHG1n0051YDfWL5BPLD0S; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:20:13 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([107.5.36.150]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KPLC1n00k3EMmQj3gPLD9z; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:20:13 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.4.10 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:20:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20140028062012.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1390908013; bh=EtxlpMj+WaIcjvZLV3P6mNaLl8ti0NKwdC27z6lMVlc=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=NVEuPOpQRW6BzRG/3/2mCdn4lmDSOq6CIPZDl/djwW4O7/lTPGOkf8hWbEPpBM/Gk Twr7kYd37meihT5aLr/NlF30WCGOzG5mb56y/1rdsCCgAxlBM+A81aPb1E+q6/sLZZ BeB1y+fdluA8xBOvp9RehICPaYYytGlenrvSxZu4f5g5Eqn/cwr1Yvs/2RAC1SylPG qn/+9rzoxb/ed+NFiyOsSz7yQiwp/SiYSf8NZBrlwMubvWTvMwflc57Df8cMRmOV9r N+nQ9+UgF4w5q6xw9NlrFh3KIrVgAFGbWpffSSEJ6cwtPz97IWi8UqwoD0023Ij8GD naFo7x9HFBJWw== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] master X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Karl Dahlke List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:20:34 -0000 Yes I think it would be easier if all this was moved into master, if Adam then had permission to push into masster, as I do, if that's ok with you chris, and it's ok with me of course. A piece of my brain thinks there should be some backward compatibility, like a flag to makefile to build the old way against 185, for those who don't have 24 yet, but then a larger piece of my brain thinks about the linux kernel, where they really discourage that sort of thing. Youre just expected to keep up! Linux has a means of conditional compilation #if version <= 3.2.7 That kind of thing, but I tell you, you hardly ever see it in the kernel code, because if you ever started your code would be full of #if versions maybe all the way back to 2.4, and impossible to read, so they just tell you generically not to do it. So I have come to understand the practical point of view of marching forward, and if you want the latest of this you better get the latest of that. Anyways I digress; I think master would be fine, the only thing we really have to stop nad pause and well test is the threshold of version 3.4.11. I think we all have to say yea before we do that. Karl Dahlke