From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55733779BE for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:27:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1348321wib.17 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:27:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jcYO+kaGX/eExR8eWGnxyRKIj11F4T9dF6gthtXcyzY=; b=XxE+kMy4EIgwm+hq6oh0XtcG1QZLnXAoDHbABJdv3yaylRFZSqSb4Zy9HQ9kY+qDL6 IQfHQJnDOFeNcZQriJYWUnfoZORIEB0ytCoT1ruC4ZUDNb8BLebfJq+fEfr3WVT3wL8L OBVW8Z+BhgB8fFCwv+tbUT8Lr14ecr+TGopk0j+IXKdKqCnMuAAv39pa5rmezR6W4IYQ ly96i26QV4QWZlcyAbFJJMelMOTUko0DP4zSqjIQIji2cczvGAZCiORnLucL19pvAKjr z2st56auFhXxvKjx7e7qPV8C267hhA+e70Q961BLfZsa+REvYLKarVC+rLhianVdF/+9 EoCw== X-Received: by 10.180.91.164 with SMTP id cf4mr7098948wib.2.1389734861332; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:27:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm1609028wje.12.2014.01.14.13.27.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:27:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:27:37 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Chris Brannon Message-ID: <20140114212737.GC31480@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20140008060551.eklhad@comcast.net> <20140108124047.GB3935@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <87y52iuwej.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y52iuwej.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] js progress update X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:27:44 -0000 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:43:32PM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote: > Adam Thompson writes: > > > Thanks, will do. Whilst I do this, is there any chance people could test my > > fork of edbrowse as well? > > Sorry, I had a bit of a rough week, so I haven't really had a chance to > look at this. It builds for me. I'll try and test and review in the > next couple of days. Thanks, hope things improve for you. I think there're still some js related bugs there, but they're hard to trigger. I'm not sure if they're gc-related or not. I'm also not sure if they were already present or if they're new. All I know (discovered after I sent my last email) is that it does occasionally seem to segfault, and I also got an error caused by a NULL jwin pointer (not managed to reproduce this one). We also need to work out a good way of testing for memory leaks, I was thinking of running under valgrind for extended periods of web browsing. Cheers, adam.