From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <arthompson1990@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56CA77D04
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so6553402wgg.3
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=3MEwWQwH2sq8vIpOkSapZpg5hT9JXRIHgEgsVPLx6kg=;
 b=LmrgLGPRdWGmL109pfZ2M1rxGdzR0F1uS/1rwiyDu3jq6PV+E/FsodUMV1fxDdoFSv
 lmcp1IOOSS3h8A56klJDTxHeMo3I2sJlxhn5fVBj7z6yQoyoX4L8Yuql5L0tyTYSOA4n
 Jd0RbwQgJBy34e/Cc0GuG9jluwcxHPrqQ71luxbrllLlxftHDqcDQ5eCckPV406YDV0g
 qS02GhFOijWiBcNAGKeFAkG1/Z6vIxZGExBVTnuSCn9/bd94e1ttysdvqV/K3dfJtY0K
 8VblS45wNMKNqqBdz9/32BEGv3PRikv9N3YZnTgHfuabiPNOQmgvAd3MrKvSHFIe+MOt
 MO0Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.105.65 with SMTP id gk1mr24258329wib.12.1391098153129;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk.
 [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm13368137wij.3.2014.01.30.08.09.11
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:09:09 +0000
From: Adam Thompson <arthompson1990@gmail.com>
To: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
Message-ID: <20140130160909.GD6131@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk>
References: <20140030100901.eklhad@comcast.net>
 <87iot1lcg7.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87iot1lcg7.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] indenting
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:09:38 -0000

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:24:40AM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote:
> I don't care at all.  Whatever the agreed-upon style happens to be, I'll
> stick to it.  I have no problem with using the indent script from the
> kernel source.

Same here, I usually code then format with the indent script anyway,
since I usually use speech and edbrowse's rather nice feature to search for the balancing
brace to check what's going on, and then use a braille display if I need to
examine the code more closely.

It kind of makes sense to use the kernel indent script though,
particularly if you're used to the kernel style.

> > Also I wonder if we should not run eb.h through such a script.
> 
> Maybe not.  I won't be surprised if the indentation on struct
> declarations gets out of sync at some point, but this file doesn't
> change all that much.

Probably not.  If we're always using tabs then fixing the structs is easy anyway.
That being said, I'm probably the most likely one to forget to do this.

Cheers,
Adam.