From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <arthompson1990@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9AF78414
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Thu,  6 Feb 2014 02:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f8so1427739wiw.9
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:34:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=+OH8O39KUxnD7xqenyLIDloBEruUXNfEUDQHp+DX4Kw=;
 b=ZEK9oKOUpDKmVOEtD/CtsqbcJInHIsJqQskXBw5HzXgx/UI9N4pkdNQsBaN2TUeJFm
 lYQNejiqHk3+zlmY92/r+mlL4VP58+wYRBwBA0BNmN7C0WkTNPLw7jOjuDNEiS0Ijk0e
 JEo+F4O45hFaTVV2LsEgvqwUAzC8GT4yieYpe75mAHkBGcq++RqtZrfOUZby52EUn/YF
 YGGj97VwxJKEz8YUfdYLL/OcgZ0wTAWR2pdZ54Bkc4IzTrpE7SYreZIqJhfLC2Zx17H8
 2SkFH7EIcFC1MVOH6ovFy1ngXYTbkNxH0/RKgVV9Ebd5y+BzZRE8dkf3aYa3FtnsY0VO
 mebw==
X-Received: by 10.180.187.16 with SMTP id fo16mr20617667wic.26.1391682848102; 
 Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk.
 [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo6sm4452860wib.7.2014.02.06.02.34.06
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000
From: Adam Thompson <arthompson1990@gmail.com>
To: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
Message-ID: <20140206103404.GS32200@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk>
References: <20140105212424.eklhad@comcast.net>
 <87txcchn87.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87txcchn87.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] 24
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:34:44 -0000

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:35:52PM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote:
> Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net> writes:
> 
> >> I also need to work out why the debian mozjs24d package causes edbrowse
> >> to just segfault on startup whereas a manually compiled one doesn't
> 
> It fails in a function called indirectly from JS_NewContext.  The
> failure seems to be in mozilla::HashBytes.  For some odd reason, I can't
> trace that function with gdb, even though I have debugging symbols
> compiled in.

Yeah, the debian package's debugging symbols reference iceweasel source which
isn't in the package (and at any rate the reference is to /tmp).
In addition, the packaged lib is compiled with optimisations making debugging...
interesting... even when the debugging symbols actually work.
These difficulties were the main motivation behind using my own compiled mozjs24.

Should this be reported as a bug against the package,
or is this segfault an edbrowse problem do you think?

Cheers,
Adam.
PS: the mozjs26d package is still broken so no chance of building against that.