From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:17]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB51278668 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cCQd1n0081ap0As5AFSxnt; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:26:57 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([107.5.36.150]) by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cFSx1n0033EMmQj3iFSx4o; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:26:57 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.5.1 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:26:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20140211112657.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1394551617; bh=6jZPKsuyvlm+NqvMXxPXeNVoSbKZFYkMHJPatyOAoV0=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Kdeaklx1l/9ka0Swz/k+c3pFilDawE36qb0SIS6Az7eNtS91a6l1gaTa9JMgzh7ZF U676t2kqRhibUdNT9xtLTXBEUusnVHbcDkPksyse3ohOdFjHzWF9WMafMLTN2mOxVS 4bJCTMGsR+bGy69EaQanTH70QeZ6szChPixPYl7pHOHLEmQTKktZn0DwC4y8SksCWk X7Hoc/m6Lbi5PJyAXUZF7+uEyKmIjGxGTUNkDQ+GjbwzkNpzGBp7mLukU/j5Q76sih haOhfjt9eKlbWa8z5JnG6aj6ChysxcaJMZHAoZQnOQV2aFO3pPBxfgdAy0W4ncCuJy 7UMv7KL+F765w== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] Setters and Post Scan X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Karl Dahlke List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:28:17 -0000 > I think so. I don't think it would really be feasible to handle a fully > dynamic page in setters. How expensive is this going to be in terms of > runtime? In theory it could be bad, in a contrived webpage that I wrote myself, perhaps growing as n^2 for the number of html tags, but in practice I don't think it will be an issue.