From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F5A784B4 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1170744wib.6 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:59:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vMNPPQsGZFz0hUnJ5ammK5pnJEAplHBzGsAAullNPlI=; b=LRxu1248jHUJunMPRvYO2IEvAiBUeUF5/Ud7DBUbkk+f1DVrnkif5t19XDp2wbpGGF OBf1OgAPQMVnQYNqxINwBulDcgYGeJQwmb4AdU3NmceIr4YlwKgQM5kLxLdVUwtWg3Yt KKMdDJUB7GGBsQGOo75TjZv964UFSrc3HbtChU1elT64Jj8liVdcPCmdyWaD/b2B5EXB LdDXYmoFSWBYt5jt6LbdmWrwZEMOltHR2+6dsHeryfUn0lw/yNm+7YbS/1rj0b8SZJDJ qHeXpttIH/bxWwMoevyqGpjtWuVew2oSpX0fS5D29ISDZyEJMl9kQhPard0Ue1hBt7Nc dSBQ== X-Received: by 10.194.134.132 with SMTP id pk4mr8445581wjb.82.1393009156556; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm10109171wix.10.2014.02.21.10.59.15 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:59:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:59:13 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Karl Dahlke Message-ID: <20140221185913.GX28870@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20140121074647.eklhad@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140121074647.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] noscript X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:00:15 -0000 On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:46:47AM -0500, Karl Dahlke wrote: > Ok - the noscript tags become active when js is not. Thanks. Pulled, built and working well. > We can talk about features to turn them off in the nojs directive in the > config file later. Yeah, not sure of the best way of doing this. > > Yes I too have run into some sites where it claims js is off, but > it is really on. > My objects are not complete enough for it to recognize that it is on, > so it prints those warning messages. > These are the sites that lead us to the objects > or methods that we are missing. > But that's another story. Yeah, I think a complete dom is a way off yet, but we're certainly making large improvements. So much so that I think that we should probably be aiming at a release around the start of April. What do other people think? > > My jsrt file includes some noscript tags for testing. > Browse it with js off and you'll see what I mean. > I put in some tags, not just text, to make sure the html runs > inside noscript, as it should. Thanks, works well. Cheers, Adam.