From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A611D7862B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so8092664wgh.34 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ugmqA3DEvo26VdVIpMGBRb4/iNSBIiO3fatM5AT68ZY=; b=fZsmUSQG9hVwMOUWVG9dKa3DgFICxgrZeEFF70uzHmRSQmHBiVgReeg+gny48pmir0 1wyHXtJOG0FsuIFwCxHmKGVGNUr/ZwARZRmV0NgyR1Y2G1UdDnTQKF+vtIW3GLDAtKmV pme0RTJKp2E7jMzBOrK8Gw/HucwhOQg5PDaCtRUb69VVsIy9aVZoYU3uldVbYLhDKBr6 9smZM9WTFU+z2RnTf/ejOO1XfjS/0nSE4pV52xL5O9H0rd3KxpNxOaq/bQsZ2c5F14x2 iET25Nu5YGNIPj6xiHgbgCET5u4KpxMKKNVPsFZjXyJyDGYzP/TeSe91P4flbsYBGIoA 3nIA== X-Received: by 10.194.24.35 with SMTP id r3mr2882959wjf.68.1394570036779; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm64167758wjs.8.2014.03.11.13.33.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:33:48 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Karl Dahlke Message-ID: <20140311203336.GA13789@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20140211112657.eklhad@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xesSdrSSBC0PokLI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140211112657.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Setters and Post Scan X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:35:19 -0000 --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:26:57AM -0400, Karl Dahlke wrote: > > I think so. I don't think it would really be feasible to handle a fully > > dynamic page in setters. How expensive is this going to be in terms of > > runtime? >=20 > In theory it could be bad, in a contrived webpage that I wrote myself, > perhaps growing as n^2 for the number of html tags, > but in practice I don't think it will be an issue. Out of interest, how do you arrive at this figure? Cheers, Adam. --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTH3MsAAoJELZ22lNQBzHOFYMIAI8jIXzjez2S249zbXnjLS5U 9jvtzWzM/aJbdyrUpGlLQsGwYo2qCzvIrev+tFoZjXdxSuQbaqaTk9gMYDpyhg8y FnqLxxjotCj3LzwXyFIbwHN1WEioc6X0by5q/zssh4IamIymxYkRtzbYYZ6f4syQ Nc/hYTEwhpBsZeL1MrW3C1IdEYNCw8KMudS5KtjuKwOSPlTVN1vTRpeQYipo4e+u /ddm38D9kmzdsESbuxA+Ip+k/gE22gKqgJrYoGubf8VhbGZW58KbdtT3AAaiuQ2U brY8ZJ5WOU+WHccR4oumwTZvis0mBGB4bvN1TYxsIMLh3PsMRGyLqRTkAbDuZ0M= =9x94 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI--