From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:211]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8C477AF8 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id t1xf1n0081swQuc5B6EqfV; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:14:50 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([68.84.191.77]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id t6Eq1n00E1gep303b6Eqn6; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:14:50 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.5.1 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:14:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20140322141432.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1398190490; bh=H8dZ8GFuld1UHArtOKmhmLXPQ7ppqSyMjwVGAQ18QkE=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=cb39USZl9fpDgjPGcnuh7xyHD3faUWea8q3rdpYpxhz2TyPqnkaE5TtkVESUjV9tm 202kYiFJo3I2ovVEy6YmTbrBgcl/8EKYOgeai5qTRUfIPQ/zfC6bKoEEXJoVyStO1G woEJ388H/kgTOlClrdbzB/meyTb2/cLPE5p4kurVLQXZv0HbxdNf6udQlANCO97XLU OlqIydJKBxyiPHUWMbEOvHk3RzOApHZ4Pc+Qr+KbNSMy1fZQuT6TcGx3Ufek4G+n1r jJq6wxX8vYCsASSkGD84DftyDSqvGzSFA0OJnp3c8ys0XQJXiVl2nSp4VygbKMhS9m 3vkBEIS7TZGbg== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] Refresh http header X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Karl Dahlke List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:15:11 -0000 > Refresh: 30;url=http://the-brannons.com/ Sure, but, this is I think exactly the same header I use for code 302. I guess you're saying sometimes we get this header with code 200, and are suppose to jump on that. Well I'm not looking for that, I'm watching the codes first, but I might be able to check for the header even on code 200. Not sure if I should infer in this case code 301, 302 or 303. I'll let you know. Karl Dahlke