From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:228]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E220577B1D for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id WEde1o0041vXlb85FFlTCM; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:45:27 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([IPv6:2601:4:5380:4ee:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id WFlM1o00C5LMg213dFlMFG; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:45:21 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.5.1 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:43:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20140624114317.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1406216727; bh=LVhmwoNr34dLWRsfHruv4Jnk1dzWWCZ+MmMXbCZcfq8=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=PZqxpcMutAaLlPMKmWDM2iX8COhSZNLNqDAFZ6bRzj8QxZG1oElcwhILN1mM3aHjl Nf9UmJTyIUet2barxR81BkpISZ5jIGLP16ZxXjJAMf5sEdPSzioQ/FbKDRSvI0F65H PiHbZN5Zh6/Cx8EgNGw0c13c5gN6eFKJnw/zQUlaiV10o1jWwBZTcONRXSzFNQhpSG jWyLOwtj3HKNNjotCh4rUhoFjIkU7gYr4VHaCKX8wAHIZgOJ9vd/8RMzFXjejICwCj 9HxV8iQOVQx967FZUqZKCtULFwLh5FC8DL7+SA131PG/o3HN9g3VS5aOV45pIoFodm 6DICoILoKka2A== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] tag attributes in edbrowse DOM X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:46:04 -0000 > we don't currently support the type attribute for script tags Well I was able to change this in 2 lines of code, so I did. type and language are now present in the script object. See if that helps, or perhaps another small incremental change is needed. > I was wondering how difficult it would be to load all attributes for tags > into the DOM, not just the ones which have direct effect on the browser. Well I've wanted to do this for a long time. It would have been easy, if I had done it from the start. Now I could still do it but the hard part would be taking out all the places all over the code where I look for and store certain attributes. Or maybe it's ok to store them twice I'd have to look into that. Anyways it is something we definitely want to do someday. Karl Dahlke