From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2022F77ADD for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k48so2484054wev.34 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:34:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=y2KBxV2NaQQX3xMHP4RFIZZXCXJ6ntjOEZFtksViFQ0=; b=e/I8CIBCQ3YW2yLQeHdDhhmhJtE6HQQ3PWyqOMji8Tc0l1ACDKsCxW6mqxJF9ERxtZ Ynhhc6PNvEYYFOlPOnYWXn3LqqJXKRuNn9uMdbayzpV/BkWl2AvFkRNB9FKfcMXHv3AV gU7MKNXRH/nxNCgrh4cjYtjj0bMaqgF/7ZqFJlfvZhFuVWiUgcdbWswQar5RjegX6dct Xym3D1G+K+XzgBI5YfcEOa3BhKkQ3XQp5uwTDPJ218KBYUxxML29EDW3ZM0xdSsTqMGr AZpvO/Qi1pcU2pRQt5aMMnqp4HmVTTyy7g5VQJavlHvrIumuF5EOtNhIQbIbAyyrJI1l yIWA== X-Received: by 10.180.76.132 with SMTP id k4mr12304237wiw.1.1403721292865; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm15045283wif.22.2014.06.25.11.34.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:34:46 +0100 From: Adam Thompson To: Kevin Carhart Message-ID: <20140625183446.GD5577@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20140407185427.eklhad@comcast.net> <20140622164153.GR5577@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <20140624140224.GV5577@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="McOwgVabxjWRBDh+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] about compiling 3.5.1 X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:35:20 -0000 --McOwgVabxjWRBDh+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kevin, On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:48:48PM -0700, Kevin Carhart wrote: > The information for carhart.net is: >=20 > [kevin@carhart ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.10 (Final) > [kevin@carhart ~]$ rpm -q centos-release > centos-release-5-10.el5.centos > [kevin@carhart ~]$ uname -rmi > 2.6.18-371.9.1.el5.centos.plus i686 i386 Ah ok, so it's a fairly up to date (2013) version of a fairly old (2007) b= ranch of centos. This probably means that your Python, though up to date i= n terms of security is quite old. What does: python --version produce as output? > Then I wanted to learn more linux and be able to stretch out, and have > someplace to run long HTTP-scripting jobs that are my weird career. So I > went to vpslink.com and have had a 32-bit CentOS for the past five years. > [root@crispi-gosh ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.4 (Final) > [root@crispi-gosh ~]# rpm -q centos-release > centos-release-5-4.el5.centos.1 > [root@crispi-gosh ~]# uname -rmi > 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen i686 i386 Ok, this is the same branch of centos (major version 5), thus with the exce= ption of security patches (this is 6 minor versions *behind* carhart.net), = the base package versions (i.e. kernel 2.6.18 python 2.) are prob= ably the same. Again, what does: python --version output? > My Debian 7.5 Profile (Latest 64 bit (3.14.5-x86_64-linode42)) > 3.14.5-x86_64-linode42 x86_64 unknown Ok, what do: uname -a cat /etc/debian_version python --version produce as output? Note that the only reason I'm primarily focusing on the python is it sounds =66rom what your saying that that's what's breaking in terms of the mozilla= build process. Do you have any sample outputs of the breakages? Also, your version of debian is interesting since the profile name indicate= s a kernel which is newer than that shipped by default with Debian 7.5. This is by no means an issue since Debian provide (and I run on one of my debian stable boxes) newer kernels via Debian backports. In addition, it's possible that for some reason linode require a certain ke= rnel version. > >How am I finding 3.5.1 so far? >=20 > It's a pleasure, as usual. I am excited to play along and learn what the > new parentNode and event code is doing and ask some questions. Thanks = to > the developers for all of this work! Glad to hear you're enjoying it. Cheers, Adam. PS: I wonder if, once we get through the interesting mozjs issues we're goi= ng to run into any other incompatibilities with libraries. I'd be interest= ed to find out so we can update the docs accordingly. --McOwgVabxjWRBDh+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTqxZGAAoJELZ22lNQBzHOXL4IALBICYCKAbz1bPZYnjEyoTer sd8tBaNXGF4HluF4whZuAmOeDVrecVlmIADD2RFcSJgWFmvolnw3z3WUYEsuIlzV ItCsyxd7IygMtm1jkKr/47F4nYuS5Udjq3PBI/sh4S6SsFkn5l4E3mYig/0Ms9Pi 5hyTdvZWpdzkORY8kTGDvYZ5NuQyYbDEazB77sK6vfnSWbQympMuQ5VfopLY7TVh r9fKXhxs4TsQouvdXbZ0dAWJlDOmZO8oJC1H1s3KzVEEZ6mWYRADIAsIZx1dqVkf COwoL/orrle78vhtfrbc8VsZPkHI9AltmnA5UJ4nL6PBBOzqebaWkWHwCbtAwDk= =jZr0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --McOwgVabxjWRBDh+--