From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84ADB77CD1 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a1so3392116wgh.14 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:11:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=62UTfwJ5rhhgd7swt8/huN89DOX/rvh5raTLGWlkH4c=; b=d+dyrt/btMJR6qdFtOTbym7pCh8zmoeXWd+tVEcAXMqx9lUpP3irNgS5HlbpWK1whB Jigc/Q1Vj/B/78XPzka5X4bCD4KvHolivY6FWzXSRrClRsd3EZHsBG47LHSPeK5EUSEE v+PNa6Ci33URtv/FT14OKyto59rQ8zsv/MTLhBwD4uCupR1BPojkEmYwiuYaJUSXyWT8 IDo8ytJ+9l2jRK5aKO34DyUU++PWoDVIY6EtkeOQi4Bt9bsZKBD0zRy3M3Ox62S33e++ eHSQr2qnblb/WVThFvoDgrV3KVmhYr15rMNgKS1BN/HjS4dHOBDhPAXlr4+mgNN7qCbh RVCw== X-Received: by 10.194.184.230 with SMTP id ex6mr20239789wjc.83.1409411517912; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm6250573wiy.19.2014.08.30.08.11.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:11:38 +0100 From: Adam Thompson To: MENGUAL Jean-Philippe Message-ID: <20140830151138.GB2748@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <53F78051.4000406@free.fr> <20140822203203.GQ2748@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <8761hkgooo.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> <53F890E9.3030401@free.fr> <20140823133611.GS2748@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <53F89B86.2090100@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iXVVnr8Hn1WiTnFI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53F89B86.2090100@free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Update Edbrowse X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:13:22 -0000 --iXVVnr8Hn1WiTnFI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 03:47:50PM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > I'm going to have alook at this, since at the last time of checking, the = js > 31 package (from experimental) contained a broken symlink in place of > jsapi.h. Also, do you know of any docs for mozjs 31, as all docs on the > mozilla website talk about mozjs 24. >=20 > The situation of JS support in Mozilla 31 is not clear for me. That is wh= y I > filled bug 758928 on Debian about libmozjs, so that the maintainer could > explain to me the situation. We can also write to > icedove-dev@packages.debian.org to contact the maintainers and asking. It= 's > my next task if no an]ier on my "bug" report. Ok, so it looks like mozjs 24 *should* be maintained, at least according to= how I read the bug report. > >>After checking, freeze happens on November. So: > >>1. Do you want now to work on compatibility with JS 31? > >>2. Otherwise, I propose we wait end of September to be sure Edbrowse bu= ilds > >>on any architecture without problem. Next, you could release in 1st 15 = days > >>of October. Then I could introduce the released package in sid (October, > >>15th), and it willl go to testing (and be frozen) on Octoberb 25th. > >>Does it fit? Do you want a more restricted schedule? > >The timings sound fine to me provided the new edbrowse package runs corr= ectly. > >Incidentally, I'd be interested to see how you built this as the last ti= me I > >tried against a Debian packaged mozjs it segfaulted as soon as you atte= mpted to run it. >=20 > You can see the package with apt-get source edbrowse. I think it ships the > debian/ dir. See rules file to see what happens. If you want to try seeing > exactly what does dh-auto_build, you can run pdebuild or dpkg-buildpackage > and you will see the commands it run (as it displays make output). Ok, where do I download this source package from as apt-get -t experimental= source edbrowse still downloads the old version. > I do not any particular thing, but I rely on libmozjs24.0 package, which > seems more reliable. That's also why I wait for September 15th, to see if > someone has a segfault or if the Debian Release team find a conflict with= a > Mozilla tool (that is why it was removed from Debian). Feedbacks will ena= ble > to test now it works. Maybe the libmozjs had a successful update. Ok. If mozjs 24 is going to be in the next release of Debian then we probab= ly want to make edbrowse work correctly with this mozjs, then look at the later versions of the mozilla js code as and when they bec= ome properly documented and released. Cheers, Adam. --iXVVnr8Hn1WiTnFI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAempAAoJELZ22lNQBzHOU5UH/1oFRIt2bK0PXjUJXhcbpzYy DUbDEgDkYvLWvjyqHav59KfZka7Fz1VGS3D/FyYwIyo0eALNq2O/D64nJnKSWbq5 g3D/ERCzF5ZUrVAPmRS3wVtRyZqBSR9A2Fy3bdmKe+QpZO0XeIljmV2P3dUai0Kv t396UrHeGQHIKuG5B228zhYAP+Zq5Wy03fk/I7cB3TS2xpzkc/2HbVpcpvqVOJ9y BfTHgbm+0u6Uox83kg/PuEU+sj/tWIu2n9AwT4a2iNyjD1rXu9tEbEG/uNhCVlKx 3ZOo7ZL5beeEvZ7MjPbrxcrFR2tN15Vs8CsoMJyUSyjooY2EiVbbx45wuFtnbMc= =1uwk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iXVVnr8Hn1WiTnFI--