[Edbrowse-dev] tidy5

[Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net>]

> if tidy5 builds as a library (I hope it does)
> then we build and install their code same as any other library.

Sure, that makes sense.
So we'll see who has a chunk of time first to look into this.

If said library swallows html and gives us a tree of nodes, should we:

A) convert those nodes into the struct htmlTags we have today
and use most of our existing machinery, incremental, or

b) follow that tree directly, build js nodes off of it, use those nodes,
don't use our structures any more, this more of a rewrite.

I'm not expecting an answer, because we'd probably have to look
at the code, and library, and resulting tree to answer the question.
Just something to chew on.

Karl Dahlke