From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:34]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0474E79395 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nyFA1p00A2EPM3101yFHnM; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:15:17 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([IPv6:2601:4:5380:4ee:219:21ff:feb9:ba8d]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nyFH1p00D08MP5701yFHP3; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:15:17 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.5.2 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:15:17 -0500 Message-ID: <20150103171517.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1423001717; bh=MbAMCt3l7IegjqU3t4FKccY/xv+pAlT9j+/TTU8j8jI=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=BSmmv4UR6LsIKwCNZQzIPJkjnqP6XTLF9ne7CaU5xC3T4E7M/v/jxxlZs4ZB4epmd gOY5L/8IQTFzm3PCCoi4Iz6d3Re4hjURmJNLkSDnVrFfg38xmRD2jG7pAxEW6p6X4A s41t9c9mMdQYHjKxWLbbeVWXVkWL83qwUzICsXBlhrKqgvRMiwQ8fXbrnqREi8tzs0 WEBwpuF5MnD9vwVLHWh2krho82tvthC3/HM6WUWVnON718p3SQMeezz33BbqhGkF2q yZc/BllvvoN6bY7hlK+s9Tw/OEeHQPRDQRo5goSiNGa8Bw4iQxvMs11o7pP9qY1wwp JyESa//uq/HvQ== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] tidy5 X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:15:23 -0000 > if tidy5 builds as a library (I hope it does) > then we build and install their code same as any other library. Sure, that makes sense. So we'll see who has a chunk of time first to look into this. If said library swallows html and gives us a tree of nodes, should we: A) convert those nodes into the struct htmlTags we have today and use most of our existing machinery, incremental, or b) follow that tree directly, build js nodes off of it, use those nodes, don't use our structures any more, this more of a rewrite. I'm not expecting an answer, because we'd probably have to look at the code, and library, and resulting tree to answer the question. Just something to chew on. Karl Dahlke