From: Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net>
To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] version philosophy
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:34:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106093413.eklhad@comcast.net> (raw)
Yes this is primarily a question of philosophy.
Should the version number of edbrowse change
just before a new version is stamped in git, or just after?
Example, anyone following us by git pull, and there are a few brave souls
doing that, will see version 3.5.2, but it isn't really 3.5.2,
that version was set in stone a few months ago.
It's really 3.5.3 in progress.
Or maybe 3.5.2x (experimental), or some such.
Any thoughts?
Karl Dahlke
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 14:34 Karl Dahlke [this message]
2015-02-06 18:38 ` Chris Brannon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150106093413.eklhad@comcast.net \
--to=eklhad@comcast.net \
--cc=Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).