From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:250:56ff:feaf:29a]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90492789A5 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id tSWB1p0062D5gil01SWlXz; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:30:46 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([IPv6:2601:4:5380:4ee:219:21ff:feb9:ba8d]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id tSWl1p00908MP5701SWleD; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:30:45 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke User-Agent: edbrowse/3.5.3 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:30:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20150117093045.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1424183446; bh=P3DtVNa3eo79LqFrLioHxrteNll/NmTgywrOD2N/B3s=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Mh2iChC3ae6V6FpICAKk7Hgpw8onn5SVAywWE1pMCK682IBTLt98OVWbFzJ2Z894F LzVaBiPRQ3POeOX6s9++5MB74SNc/Ow76tI0jvyNWh+8aaj3L2p6Crwjsj5cuD9CsW T+2BPAwtQIH7fPs4/nuc/y1jJDq7+TMS6KJSlqE6FezhLg6WUDUHzVXjdJsd88m+B7 FiClIyUAriHRIVPgx82101nEG9PklMCvDuhwKbr0oYk98+xKnMxX2kSGYY46XQgAEM dzGRLHJWAzuEOBfv+215ofHzcaA7Tn/jleQWVKGlU7bwqKtFg4JBpF374sIxyDuROx BgNq/yYdpbNuw== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] edbrowse erroneously prints a warning on receiving a... X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:31:08 -0000 > warning: http error 201, CreatedAccepted I would suggest not printing this error, unless debug >= 3. I'm trying to keep 0 1 and 2 as reasonable debug levels for the average user, and 3 or higher is for developers. (After ten years I'm finally coming up with a system.) So we would want to see this but it really doesn't mean anything to the user. This would be a quick change in http.c. As we move forward, developing 3.5.4, we should again change the version to 3.5.4.something. Chris I'll leave that one to you, since you had some thoughts on version strings etc, and I mostly don't care. Karl Dahlke