Re: [Edbrowse-dev] versioning

[Adam Thompson <arthompson1990@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1042 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:18:20AM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote:
> Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net> writes:
> 
> > A good point - presetting a version number is a form of
> > prognostication,
> 
> If we used 3.5.4.git, this is just a guess at what
> the next version number might be, and we can change that guess if we
> need to do that.
> I'd be fine with something like 3.5.3+, though, since it indicates that
> we're working on whatever comes after 3.5.3.

Same here, I don't really mind either way.
There're so many different ways to do version strings that this could turn into
a *very* long discussion. I've always quite liked the year.release.bugfix
numbering myself (i.e. 2015.1 or 2015.1.1 if we have a minor bug that we fix)
but again I don't particularly care.
I equally see the benefit of 3.5.4.git or 3.5.3+ which can then be changed to
3.6 if we make the major changes we have planned, or 3.5.4 if we don't  (though I'd have a minor
preference for 3.5.3+ if I had to choose between the two).

Cheers,
Adam.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]