From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336F4794E8 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l15so44273946wiw.5 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:33:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cGMO7Jt3c/DJIycEwBdghqBfDu1mf5MD1Gw0FMa5h2A=; b=oOvUyDYGwlxUc/hD9yWFf80TfyIHsLwKXpqbmhCdprM5H01z2RXGVavmd3zAa5FfmP ZfRNS9gBUBrScPVtoY7kEkqkV5wa3Tu14LQtEfhhixYWY4XJ61RXXP2gv5vyewncQ/UM 0vNVMuzgzjA/rN8k46h2hb7hmcX0j2QxxUZY6nad9gtiSjkKOj1n5b0CRMqsH/N3UPC4 zdLm7D8e0As0KTF0Ysz8BNmsm/8ttABtqtRxqx5gLz+9l/2ZD8IHpN0TbjzAv/RjWc8A i3PWsPNAtkhXnnX1nDORzsBZ4dZqSxyww3jnRhMKw9unkInbOkvaQjEQQzoUr9BRxxHy +U4g== X-Received: by 10.195.12.35 with SMTP id en3mr2693726wjd.129.1424298780630; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm10353685wib.23.2015.02.18.14.32.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:32:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:32:56 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Chris Brannon Message-ID: <20150218223256.GB32332@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20150118053540.eklhad@comcast.net> <87h9ujl2vn.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h9ujl2vn.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] versioning X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:33:27 -0000 --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:18:20AM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote: > Karl Dahlke writes: >=20 > > A good point - presetting a version number is a form of > > prognostication, >=20 > If we used 3.5.4.git, this is just a guess at what > the next version number might be, and we can change that guess if we > need to do that. > I'd be fine with something like 3.5.3+, though, since it indicates that > we're working on whatever comes after 3.5.3. Same here, I don't really mind either way. There're so many different ways to do version strings that this could turn = into a *very* long discussion. I've always quite liked the year.release.bugfix numbering myself (i.e. 2015.1 or 2015.1.1 if we have a minor bug that we fi= x) but again I don't particularly care. I equally see the benefit of 3.5.4.git or 3.5.3+ which can then be changed = to 3.6 if we make the major changes we have planned, or 3.5.4 if we don't (th= ough I'd have a minor preference for 3.5.3+ if I had to choose between the two). Cheers, Adam. --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU5RMYAAoJELZ22lNQBzHOfB8IAK1pCPc3T8BdIF9E8sq5+VAb IyWdptXPsZTc4g29vYVQOA57XSqanwminl4F89K1pmSvsw/QxNg9vm5bR4eIFgdt oKUdS/BpqLfCl0c6OcJbyG/TvB9eanEusMhTGvnvIdRf8CHcgBb324vg7k5wbYqE 9zTHfYVkCdgDmji5RwFsXB4qU967GVT7IKZ+Nw98/K2dZ2/nWixzR82CJZ/Uu0o6 WoCwF4qnemzao4Agg5JjP5yakH8SsiCRQ+YN8pUSzfDjOzc85QNydkLRr1IZjgQj 6ARBTo9Eazulm3g4bhlnQHkrpJ0yGGjFmOCs9FPrnKD+dC8XLyl7G4W5Yra8zmE= =iJUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR--