From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997CE7AFA8 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so12083918wic.1 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HJSAG9slrUvCgEiSChTwyBDJFxQ56wvLe29iGJPHejk=; b=a5jcn5gvGK5kdMwJiOZJiVutJGw3oDxYvuNBIN+8IU9JIITvDMihMmhUr+9oaXvOtc VH1AKAJ4SJzIuwwkv+Y1zXAoxI6FVmrdkqyAm32YihnCdSvU0eiu1GmHaqLnhdRHCAHy Ap84pL9W1WPMj/9tSsFpVWzP/SUggXeUpTNZpAwvs7Qt1bPHJGTIneB+O5790CLM2Ecf A2Xy48iQtWyDrYbM+8G0dDf2p3qEP9zuhUAVVU/n/GCUItCaaXc8q4U+clGYUHbS8+7V xaNtGAGaHqYOOuDImc51MIry7sgfLqZixrsM1njyeFSRZe6owXbw9iSmMZLgmtBbgw5/ 3y4w== X-Received: by 10.194.77.230 with SMTP id v6mr17517382wjw.25.1429387511284; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dg8sm20220371wjc.9.2015.04.18.13.05.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:05:08 +0100 From: Adam Thompson To: Chris Brannon Message-ID: <20150418200508.GP5949@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20150316174053.eklhad@comcast.net> <20150418104919.GI5949@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <20150318073435.eklhad@comcast.net> <20150418130910.GM5949@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <87wq195izn.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SRTEifjNkXp0Rce" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wq195izn.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] wordexp again X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:06:18 -0000 --4SRTEifjNkXp0Rce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:33:48PM -0700, Chris Brannon wrote: > Adam Thompson writes: >=20 > > users really shouldn't be pulling the latest git and expecting everythi= ng to be > > fully working, that's not what version control's for in a collaberative= project. >=20 > Yes. Basically, if you're going to run from git, you need to follow > this list. Also note if you have an NNTP client, you can even follow > it without subscribing. Just point at news.gmane.org and read the > gmane.comp.web.edbrowse.devel newsgroup. I should probably add a note > about that to the website and README. There are lots of people out > there who prefer to remain anonymous, and they'd benefit from that interf= ace. Fair enough, and that's a cool interface I was unaware of. > > but I'd personally change the github page to point to this list rather = than the > > commandline list since git is our development environment. >=20 > Yes, but the folks Karl is discussing are contacting him directly. > I follow both lists, and the other has been silent for a while. True, but I remember that we were getting github issues there (I think). > > That being said, I accept that the build process is rather involved at = the > > minute, so we may need to work to automate some of that. >=20 > The only thing that is fiddly is the binary build process. > Releasing the code is easy. >=20 > Your message has reminded me of another problem, though. > Right now, the edbrowse web site is hosted on my server. If it needs to > change, for whatever reason, I'm the only one who can change it. > Currently, I haven't come up with a fix that makes me completely happy, > but I'll keep thinking on it. > You guys may end up with some kind of (restricted) ssh access to the > machine hosting the site. I could also set up a page on github, say > edbrowse.github.com, and we could all push to that. But github doesn't > make it easy to host binary content like tarballs and executables, I thin= k. Hmmm, what about sftp only ssh accounts chrooted to the web dir? Would that= work? Or an ftp server installation, again with virtual user accounts (or local accounts with disabled logins)? That could even use ftps. I've done such an installation before and it works fairly well. The main problem with these is versioning, not of binaries, they will be versioned in the name, but for web content. For this we could probably use a git repo which we could all push to. The server could then pull from this repo and apply the updates, with binaries being uploaded (by you currently, but via the ftp or sftp mechanisms mentioned above in future) separately. I don't want to host the edbrowse website on github, that's not a web hosting platform. If you're happy hosting it then that's brilliant, otherwise we can probably sort out alternative arrangements like= a vm running somewhere which we all have access to. Cheers, Adam. --4SRTEifjNkXp0Rce Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVMrj0AAoJELZ22lNQBzHOfucH+wSvl+qliqAQm5LgL+fFqwbi teINd9Uw4nvwqklQSPBxGELMM6JBxIboscz2POvFAUeYbExu3RJ+wjGbhEfWvkr5 GrQHdASSdXPwYqvgGxL37N2LLSVUWv7C4IqtlpBAkVP8TGWkAr5EpsxlHBlfWSnW REy+NMI0IIbTl77mVtioQcTbE11CQkjL+wY4QSWfD/6uTGYCP8wdCXVUoVPAOZdH E8V8G2ZwtCmA/Gjj1zFYSCy72ucKMBu1t8LkfwKfGv2DQA+ExuhK07FER4Okssm/ M3X+KNVRXVCHhpfAFBhLSTa+Sz0Uj1cN1BT+6aGti8JRtqntEqmzlNMESSwU2H4= =EYsz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SRTEifjNkXp0Rce--