On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:32:52PM -0400, Karl Dahlke wrote:
> > I've slightly altered this such that we now don't need ++.o versions.
> 
> Excellent! I thought about that but didn't realize it would work so cleanly.
> Will that sort of interoperability hold for other compilers?
> Anyways I applied the same change to makefile.bsd,
> which I try to keep up to date even though I don't really have a good way
> to test it.

Thanks. It should work; I'll test on Mac OsX to check.
No idea about Windows compilation, I don't even know if we can do that without
Cygwin or MinGW anyway.

Cheers,
Adam.