From: Adam Thompson <arthompson1990@gmail.com>
To: Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net>
Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] tidy debug tree, and a js script
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:26:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150830082651.GA17154@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150729120550.eklhad@comcast.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1388 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:05:50PM -0400, Karl Dahlke wrote:
> > If we want to print tidy warnings for local files fair enough,
> > but lets make it a user's choice,
>
> Actually I'm kinda stupid here.
> I built these mashinations for local files or remote files,
> and exceptions through some mechanism, filename or config options etc,
> but really all I need to do is print the tidy errors at debugLevel 3 or above.
> None of our users are going to want to see them,
> except a rare few who write their own html,
> and they can get along with db3 to check their sourcefiles.
> So that's what I should do, but still not what I'm worried about.
I agree that's the correct approach.
> > I wonder if it's just a printing thing or something.
>
> Oh I hope it is, but I fear it's not.
> (This would be a great time for me to be wrong.)
> We aren't passing the contents of script.text to the js engine yet,
> but some day we will, when tidy replaces all my software,
> and on that day we will be passing
>
> if(3 < 4)
>
> instead of
>
> if(3 < 4)
>
> At least that's how it appears.
As I said, this doesn't tally with what I'm seeing from the actual tidy tool
(the tidy 5 version) which uses the same library as we do,
so I suspect we're doing something incorrectly somewhere.
I'll have a look at that code to see what they're doing differently.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-30 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-29 10:04 Karl Dahlke
2015-08-29 13:25 ` Adam Thompson
2015-08-29 14:36 ` Karl Dahlke
2015-08-29 14:58 ` Adam Thompson
2015-08-29 16:05 ` Karl Dahlke
2015-08-30 1:15 ` Kevin Carhart
2015-08-30 8:26 ` Adam Thompson [this message]
2015-08-30 9:30 ` Adam Thompson
2015-08-30 9:49 ` Karl Dahlke
2015-08-30 10:02 ` Adam Thompson
2015-08-30 10:31 ` Karl Dahlke
2015-08-30 11:16 ` Adam Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150830082651.GA17154@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk \
--to=arthompson1990@gmail.com \
--cc=Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com \
--cc=eklhad@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).