edbrowse-dev - development list for edbrowse
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net>
To: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: [Edbrowse-dev]    One program Two processes
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 21:29:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124212941.eklhad@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151224183947.GA5173@hob.adamthompson.me.uk>

Well as we consider various architectures
I always keep in the back of my head that we're a couple of volunteers in our spare time.
(I wonder how many fulltime people work on Chrome, or Edge.)
We may not have the resources to do it the best way.
In fact this year has been an anomaly, with Geoff and Kevin joining us,
and really making good progress.

> That's cool, but what if async starts taking a long time,
> like some sort of exponential algorithm or something?

Then it takes a long time.
It shouldn't, unless the js page is badly written, but if it does, then so be it.
I'm not trying to be glib, just saying we don't have the time or resources
to build a preemtive time slicing operating system in edbrowse,
that can context switch in and out of js sessions,
in an engine independent fashion, or even within the constraints of a fixed engine -
I think we're just not going to have the time for that.
Pieces of js run under the ospices of the engine,
without preemption, in their particular context / window,
and we just hope they are sane.
On a modern computer, a js computation would have to be insane
to last more than a millisecond, and sure it could happen,
and if it does edbrowse might not react as well as Chrome,
but sometimes we're trying to get it functional,
without necessarily covering all the corner cases.

P.S. If my finances continue to nosedive I might have to return to the work force,
and that's one less edbrowse developer.
Let's hope that doesn't happen.

Karl Dahlke

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-25  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-23 15:09 Karl Dahlke
2015-12-23 18:45 ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-23 19:07   ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-23 19:59   ` Chris Brannon
2015-12-23 20:44     ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-24 11:19       ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-24 13:15         ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-24 18:39           ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-25  2:29             ` Karl Dahlke [this message]
2015-12-25 23:18               ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-25 23:51                 ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-26  9:11                   ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-26 13:36                     ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-26 15:10                       ` Adam Thompson
2015-12-26 15:23                         ` Karl Dahlke
2015-12-26 15:40                           ` Adam Thompson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151124212941.eklhad@comcast.net \
    --to=eklhad@comcast.net \
    --cc=edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).