From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:44]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF08A77C83 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 07:55:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id yFvj1r0032EPM3101Fw3F1; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:56:03 +0000 Received: from eklhad ([IPv6:2601:405:4001:e487:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id yFw31r0032MDcd701Fw33p; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:56:03 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke References: <20151122181357.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: edbrowse/3.6.0+ Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:56:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20151126105603.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1451145363; bh=YOA1QYNdiRqiHo7aDfz/sS7q2c9AMsjZKnc7fwoJgbI=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Il+TFRplzYPVdDZ2CcHcOAPiInIVqh+7YAja5yVEtK/IrJkRq2yIg1Ls20W6pWxlT 4TBM3SxFyXkDWzfUrpkDRi4KXhBz06gtBAVkk4+eYZBV/BqkL0EhG9y/vZL/TizfGK G8+jLRCBTA0F1IkYj6C5lUis+HAoAPKsFlAkdf/iTojTsP7dsAR+gazbEMx7f+VNR6 IAnqJBgtLnsSB/q4NgAnsIB4R2oHCEk3eO/SQ6pm9Cv6qP2TEvjKmcUQc9FXaBpKOk dpsY7Y4VzPKsbLu/GKcfVVmoW6L15jq4NdGl2aH6IS56Q0x5ztm+rAGb1g3wkvHoCB hzFKK+piVdCwA== Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] Rebundle / One program # processes X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:55:47 -0000 > I could revise this now, but I'm inclined to wait a while, because > it sounds like you might be about to supercede it with increments Oh I don't know, your submissions are always helpful. And our revisions may well be transparent to your work. In other words, you call httpConnect() either way, and it might call curl locally, as it does now, or it may send a request to a curl server and give you the response, but the function call is likely to be the same anyways. So I'd say press on; the only question is whether we paste it in or wait, whether it adds value as it is in its synchronous mode, whether it accesses more websites or causes unexpected trouble, or both. It's a judgment call. Usually I say "put it in", but that's me. Karl Dahlke