From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F78179321 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from erwin-bureau (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a80:e530:88c5:86b:192d:412f]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6E7822AC for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:24:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:24:18 +0100 From: erwin To: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Message-ID: <20151215212418.2bc3e607@erwin-bureau> In-Reply-To: <20151215194747.GA14939@acer.attlocal.net> References: <20151215194747.GA14939@acer.attlocal.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Failure of the g command with V3.6.0 X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:24:27 -0000 Le Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:47:47 -0500 Chuck Hallenbeck =C3=A9crivait: > I have encountered a couple of websites where the g command fails to > activate a link using the 3.6.0 release on archlinux. > An easy site to test is: www.georgehowe.com > Line 5 of that site says: * {Sign in} or {Create an account} > Neither g1 nor g2 has any effect there, although g without the numeral > gives the expected warning. Is this a known type of failure? >=20 same behaviour here on debian jessie : no effect with g1 ou g2 Erwin