From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A697892D for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 02:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b14so82978733wmb.1 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 02:19:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QIUqEd1eCqLHEv69uzZOUB10m0A2bCLWoM1dy7WB4mo=; b=vNaky0/oBFtGMZS9O9k6Z9iJHZ9+n1YvBiD7zLQSVqqwU59HriTrNhJfDXFOnZrMOV jSzsiVRj6Pm+dsRzyNxlfKHOQBcixgP8KFqI4dW/jQpmMnt5o2U5upymgg0T3A1tlIxl jISnXJgTYsh00vJwozibi3So/8ARoM1UclVY+SbNY5yte/rzSMmn5AAx30hP6roP24if u/7uDO0v8XDHWa+OzL0tVg5crRlll22FZHyRjLat8M95bLC8KZpA6KfUQLbAVgeYzy9/ wto1rjAVf7++6A/E5/ymSetdRakQ5zXLW+VJxEJi59RT65WMsZW8ynJg3A/ODARTj55X 7Jkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=QIUqEd1eCqLHEv69uzZOUB10m0A2bCLWoM1dy7WB4mo=; b=AJyE0S72rtBLJOr/hN6euYLWlhz5fUeHMEZ9hqm5O/aOEbQp3P4sBXfpetOnGLqzJX D2zXUfaZVs2M5cCPs+tpBoVynoCDjTpkvPyQtzRgtQFCisUf8J8uZDOd+qsBqlUldBdl 1wwkCh7MA3VEjzsOMz8HozKhi8mx33t+pK87dFBgWUJpE80KQ1JvFizBjcDVxj5bEnZe yuZVjplPOIqSeuPdbymQV2PDL9+VzgfSVvtpIdGrvPMgKqx8Vx7VzqQf3qxHfj1mV1Gm YIkwoxjirUnSy18xf1zAkqIEMQroHSgkDZ3PGdYLJoE427vqUQmb4Hxs53nMoiBlQXbe PFEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrLDa/4OUN0qIjzqO3zB0P+RfxluVY0ttvKzaT9ab6PMEGGozIv7F2BIg85f2v6VMnGkc2E/8B5TxHL+hOBIudc1eiCw== X-Received: by 10.195.11.226 with SMTP id el2mr22530161wjd.112.1453025998218; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 02:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from 122oven.adamthompson.me.uk (c.2.2.f.4.7.e.f.f.f.d.1.4.2.2.0.2.4.0.9.2.4.1.1.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:1142:9042:224:1dff:fe74:f22c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm10577846wmj.19.2016.01.17.02.19.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 02:19:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:16:19 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Chris Brannon Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Message-ID: <20160117101619.GA11059@122oven.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20160008145150.eklhad@comcast.net> <20160109082016.GA2925@122oven.adamthompson.me.uk> <20160009081254.eklhad@comcast.net> <20160109142626.GA6360@122oven.adamthompson.me.uk> <87pox04q2a.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pox04q2a.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Named Pipes X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:18:54 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:34:37PM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote: > Adam Thompson writes: >=20 > > I'm wondering if we should start work on 3.7 at this point, > > hold off the release to get the major changes in. > > This is going to be a big change and I'm not sure I want to have minor = releases > > differ quite so much when it comes to IPC. >=20 > Really it shouldn't be a user-visible change. It shouldn't break your > build, and it shouldn't break backward compatibility. So I'd say stick > with putting it in a minor version number. Remember how big 3.6.0 was? > But let's get past named pipes and IPC. Once we have them in, working, > and well-tested, we can decide which version we want to put out next, or > whether we want to keep going and try to add more features. Shouldn't and won't are two very different words. In addition, I'd like to make the edbrowse-curl change prior to the next ma= jor release and don't particularly see the point in having a large IPC change i= n a minor release with no user-visible changes. I think we're better off getting the architecture right and tested then goi= ng for 3.7. > We're good to go for a 3.6.1 though, I believe. > Just give the word. Ok, given that Karl's object changes are in I say go for it. I also wonder, from a version control perspective, if it's worth then making a 3.6 branch where we can make bug fixes whilst playing with IPC stuff on Master? We should be able to merge or port these changes across but this will allow us to keep up with security and bug fixes whilst we make major, non-release-ready, changes to the development code. May be we focus on getting some of the object stuff working in the 3.6 minor releases and generally fixing that side of things and keep the IPC stuff et= c for 3.7? My aim with these proposals is to increase the speed at which bug fixes can= be released whilst allowing the big changes to happen concurrently. Cheers, Adam. --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWm2nzAAoJELZ22lNQBzHOcJcH/RokMzau4bp/97S0N92f1Sod AGn8WS9q1UEaGLYWeYh7mfXoJV9aEunaXJhcmrz+HZsBHlSivTTfBbf+RjyQ3tvl aaEn4MLvOaHSY/S50wztmjK4l02B1TKcITeT2Ce5ZnHoxE3uy8oumbyuQuwuCp5o sEx2H68IIj2ymDH++jXdbnmp/H9ikmdcz2RfWJKsTaez4+CoMez600bYuI3tHCh2 izOYyXj8zSRe7kR89IPH/QWQbWhozEtWT2GrddDEwDe12cqWwTaM75Bq83Ahi3RM tX5kQVnHcyW+EapxC5GA8kUB65z9LHv3y9woBl/k9tBZEyoXRgRPqd8tcsWxxc0= =1DdP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--