From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:36]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA9879365 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.105]) by resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id FhCMbokwV8RcDFhChbEkDB; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:24:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1466598263; bh=nBqPFfbzuKQ7TReFAbvsDVuav702qoFWXnmoIXX8/5c=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=V2oANW7tiLJlJ8AHPP6VveA+4ET3RwmijvCDV3ybr4O8NcFzMKIU+1o3bWVJwL/AO ZmS62Jd3xLGyfu442jY+aP99oGV/c/ogdINhmZoMW2y4Pwsr1iIe0sD/bTWjH9Z+ga NOz054+RbREk/maNNvFNy3bRt0fFR73vmw6rW1fuwA6mCIlVNxrPfTifOPDG/+8nxy bpSk5Im2dP+bc6MUz9cD2KnwpgC4OPo4RV0OrMrJ1YWTbhwuCGJOVZ45PuojTAc2Os Zi0asboqKezTckyCCRRIXb04MTIwaTXDEpUxXGu9AMVG/5b68pXPENDwKF7d7IaZOw exSBYboMa4ixQ== Received: from unknown ([IPv6:2601:405:4003:c9e0:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by resomta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 9oQN1t00N1Jwjxf01oQNAg; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:24:23 +0000 To: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke References: User-Agent: edbrowse/3.6.1+ Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:24:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20160522082422.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] deobfuscate(js_text) X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:22:55 -0000 > I am surprised to find that when I rerun fastmail, > I don't get the TypeError at all. > Deobfuscation should be only a formatting change, Perhaps the minimized js is correct according to the js specs, but is not parsed properly by smjs. When you clean up the js code, smjs can handle it. If so this is a bug in smjs and should be reported, (more research needed here), and would also be a case for embedding the deobfuscator in the meantime, as a temp fix, though I would have concerns about that. Course I would expect a syntax error, not a type error. Karl Dahlke