From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com (mail-lf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0630D79E0B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y21so29752651lfa.0 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:38:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PQKurieF97XKAgnQWpPN96KK23u410P6fbYWnuyUMEM=; b=ezFlkvRBseDl3nyFtK54IUCsiaLITxvhP+M4sXTUutWXM0Kfl4e4UhQw80+RuZuwvz eWT7uxumKO2PNZKCeR2dbL6oJIIvOeUPg9C0jz+8JSHBhMxWo70vsy/8DUnPDq56Q7bH 3hvY7979b6GPsciYNiiktqMqRHjvHBPawNJWdyCkBO1ZWwrf3nw4gvepTjUuS6YGyg5q W/o+GBR+AfvcvGa0djc77Ze7FSJtGAcZicJlEFcohrnzRIAg7FX7bdJdmJMihEwwJoPX 8pQqZjFcunkmhmpPzp/DAdf6Ou0KMpqzs52DEi/w2gDUfRkQHO3g2vAlj88liXZ57WEn h0xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PQKurieF97XKAgnQWpPN96KK23u410P6fbYWnuyUMEM=; b=QM44Nsepj8orpHgOh02YEzkbb82QP3rfjgZP91zkXQIva6dI4RTRNsII8VTljuE+Vp Ki4gJiZoSlRL6jYOk6XrmQzFcqn7RekEu7o8QyUgNm3gH6VZNzdaMroizBYKhvA3e9IQ UIp/iAa6DJbNdwyghqPxJRIjCD57nz1sA81FkX99afyDQMYjA+0LRN2g6kn82qiD56Cj XwKxFHtFERitwKczEXFEJjNG9KJ7YXdX0Sb758hhkWwEEl3ROdaiXeo06e5NK+yxcAKz 7q80DJSYDvGNhqYNZd/VDPc8cXYg8tOC8pE0l8De+hsfVLW0Tbh/GuyTJsuWUwKgCfZb mf6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLypX0TTrjWkFvOlSEwatwsWsxByOpto9NvQA7BsZsdQg+s6KKyxuq2B7Pyc94xQA== X-Received: by 10.46.7.10 with SMTP id 10mr13934280ljh.60.1482925103283; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin (odin.sdf-eu.org. [178.63.35.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f42sm12150057lji.2.2016.12.28.03.38.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:38:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:38:05 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Kevin Carhart Cc: Karl Dahlke , Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Message-ID: <20161228113805.GA12313@odin> References: <20161029110356.eklhad@comcast.net> <20161225130639.GB16190@odin> <20161126095227.eklhad@comcast.net> <20161227191126.GD8364@odin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] $ object in javascript X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:38:00 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:47:08AM -0800, Kevin Carhart wrote: > >It depends on time zones etc, but I've certainly got time this week. >=20 > Great - I am around also. Maybe let's get calibrated and this will > supercede confusion over the time zones. Right now it's 11:30 AM in > California. Ok, according to the date header that's -0800 offset so it's now 11:30 (ap= prox) in utc, which should make it 03:30 in the morning for you? Hmmm, any idea what time/how you'd be online to work? Any preference as to = IM clients etc? > When I sit down to try to do something, I generally resort to fixing > cases from the inside out. Do you think it would be good to take a set of > tests like Acid3 and work off of that? It seems like we need an > intermediate point which is both an implementation of the spec approach, > but also gives you a series of specific things to say "this passed," "this > failed." Find-and-fix has problems because it's just one thing after the > next, forever, with no way of knowing if you have ten or a hundred > remaining. Going to the W3 consortium and getting the spec document has > problems because it is hard to know where to begin or how to translate wh= at > you're reading into an attainable task. Agreed, I like the set of tests method personally, particularly seeing as h= ow many devs seem to take a "I'll use it like this because it works" approach = to the spec which means that one could only end up implementing a partial "= fix" and miss some important use-cases. I'm going to take a look at acid3 I think and see what I can find. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYY6QcAAoJED6sZNk+oYF/edsQAIuGExBmlITqHnqY2gwg75z8 sWhC0ynRcZ6sQAKohsyr/5VMOAe3aIE0zRJ9ZgNndizD5nHacrpGQWyA46f5OZOa YW8ctkW5fT8e5qAI6eigTGF4Tna0jo77jXd1AnUq/CCoc/jka+qogpdHPiL/v8Ky 7dzDxaXyBTdZbB5C2sNwxNk+pcnJgJylggn9P3jfD/BNnwlwZ7DhNodjAtdBMkOq WgvK9lPZEW4slm+lG2cG8z2uv9ZpoDPBLaEWfWzS0a51O7N55i7iX6c0LxF5S9bZ 3xZrnsjO73EsZYOZEbkjdHmB1EhpfpZdqBINziEz1bdHjgowkD4eZ3HKAhZklnQ0 b6NTxkqsqezYHz//WDxfR8uo4WV+ZvI83oU7jQ7D6vU10pEijNRilvz3W4HOp4lP DHRqSzy6DrhvKCpzxf6q3iDAPyV2ofwOVqbdgXkLmQKfit20b3dNUSDnrHgG8lgm +QlkdgQdxf552pkJoHZGrZxqY6SHloPZgnzhZFMJ+FD7Vv8b2QVpR1s7NjuKywXg NvXVDYrjyfKQQzoxpzjbvxI3Yls0p73mwLaogUqYYXCJfUe05qwf48A0bC9tcLQG oDg/eiJygAF+1IJl1wXQ4SHd35fPg9oTZp+enrY4ZN5UxiV4tFgeJf8so3DrXfkw XuA+3GFZqqkA3iqOXqs+ =+Ioy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--