From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:36; helo=resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net; envelope-from=eklhad@comcast.net; receiver= Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:36]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFAD77C83 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.113]) by resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id gQsndMzsauShVgQsndptxk; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:30:53 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1502523053; bh=e+aNrb821562rel1Kc6TK4remg6GBPLYP+Epsg+RDHM=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=hQiK32Bb2Gv4qmD1Rffl0QG5sUo4xkRGRWsTpHcBLX/m5ob5C+ZvITjC72R9FBJ4z GkIAZaQrv8F03SZVs79zS/3qdsh3gSv0WBKTZPuXaDGoiq6W3rFWjgvnwghOpslYHT Ezd5sqNtVLRCEgp+/Ejq2xATGeO6LCTvUtotYFZcVNXh1xoJkXbnBHUYIRunijP2Vz Oy+c9GjRaz5D1hzYsaFgmLg6hBIQ6wxGtAnv53B10LjLtcAVxBKm63cPUBT1Gtit84 7l76Y902uio3NIVUzYIkxTo4K09eLsw5oJOfwBJhBBXphK0pbyva8HJ8BCEwQzeOoQ I8XHWfOGXR79A== Received: from unknown ([IPv6:2601:408:c301:784d:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id gQsmdBtiWuwmngQsmdbC1X; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:30:53 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke References: <20170622224940.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: edbrowse/3.7.0+ Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 03:30:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20170712033052.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=nextpart-eb-067452 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDI1tU4bOLN2aV8QJ8bjIssH7dQQz5KOzdQbiZmOdtHuLHW1bn11bBSn2fqIyEnqX3TSxlBJfR14tE6ufsPIJg53fQQ8pg4glfe6zAdqoE1uS1eN9Bf5 FeBkT45JGFc1ycxczg+p/B1mDc0x6m1KuWih0UQiV7R7cIhQL9JcMTEx Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] JS1 X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:30:54 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --nextpart-eb-067452 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Interesting that you should point this out. My throttle is only valid for intervals, which fire repeatedly. There are no restrictions on timers, which fire only once. So if a timer is scheduled for now + 10ms, then it fires at now + 10ms. However, if that timer schedules another timer for now + 10 ms, then = that timer fires in 10 ms, and it continues every 10 ms, and you have = found a way around my restriction. In any browser, that's more resource intensive than a 10 ms interval. We're constantly creating objects every 10 ms, which gc must clean up = before they accumulate, etc. It's so inefficient I'm guessing nobody would do this, except maybe an = acid test. Karl Dahlke --nextpart-eb-067452--