From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43; helo=resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net; envelope-from=eklhad@comcast.net; receiver= Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E6FF77DE5 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.113]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id lNVwdQgoJsqsJlNX0dtmT1; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:56:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1503701810; bh=jArFYtgvBVkuS6EkLF9nC/wuqqOrxXWKVhewuPu29t8=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=P6oYbad7ag8tU1QFc5qgjsjP9gk3s4Xq60AW/jvvhzyCgA2TiQYJoUwIcv2vY8kGN XQPijiSjIljiqe3rgEnoVQPh87ekzRgZsJndSCJPVv9m7K5YmAPqHBEMuNVaGsxG/q mOGFFbMLIjnOcKe9lx10lxL2fDW8VseH5Y4+N77xsPsmsrRdwK0O/zD0ikxZwxwBKL TFu/0wf1m1GDH+7SMTevpiizEPk3PfnCODMoDAjy6Lv9/utqaR2Riz3biV4xBXCjsO d4T9bXUmPjKdSmCe0DwAgStL5atAI1rus5RfNSJkEaCxvYqMuueBTVERdU4joxNFHH cQfg+3Hwrzhhg== Received: from unknown ([IPv6:2601:408:c301:784d:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id lNWzdEZKI6htGlNWzdFzIY; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:56:50 +0000 To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke References: <20170719113834.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: edbrowse/3.7.1 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:56:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20170725185648.eklhad@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBcHsbR829FEdfeQOp1sC1g24zXHHT4Qa/5amJ0Jh7Sk/EyZZSJgOAcoipbBlmqQWjIdxuFjoLLSEaeCKt+o+G0kgZ9elVJUCMO9hjbyPyEDEZ7nKx/y koJyPDRYoPnUhd5ATeosGOrtmYDsx3r9x0aG0RdztO28sKFDfXz83ASr Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] whitespace nodes X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:56:22 -0000 > I haven't been able to get additional nodes created out of newlines Not sure how hard we should work on this, or even if we want it, just to pass an acid test. It probably has no bearing in the real world, and who wants all those empty nodes cluttering up the tree? For now I think we should just delete or comment out line 227 in the acid test file, it's just understood that this line is nulled out, then test 0 should pass and we move on. Let's get the value out of the acid tests without becoming obsessed over them. That's my gut feeling right now. Karl Dahlke