From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78AF877BC5 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.100]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id aHDzhhGreRZD9aIdmhpQJc; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:39:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1560166746; bh=6IgxOzntcVrjTE73kVw+Ad8mHdoF4XJ9CeX4FPBJijA=; h=Received:Received:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Date:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=S1sU0y0icjGWRr7CkvjqfvQ+WnshE/xXO6d+oEl/Byhw+GLuOBqld7at3ByMAKiQQ gZ0pUWfG7F5ZE2rZ6nkHQdsD/ote5ghIsLBAv2TQEQiDJiBxspXhn31lQIJxYgxEHP bPdZypODxEacle/5uKoqpC+oIEGK8bh6WuyXly+SBTU1w/Fv8WhNwCvKLT7fuqRJKj RuWJ5AEVuU7DYPPhmNcGZ0RVF81Nbn0FgdpGf9qNKG3oQF89gZST3NrxWxLKJ5JRc4 uLbhzbaMcVmq+CTlmPqHXNqp9tOphxnZ5RzDiem54N0+XRemklSpFaSFbB35wd/dCM Qh7/o1/TAEPuA== Received: from unknown ([IPv6:2601:408:c303:3f49:21e:4fff:fec2:a0f1]) by resomta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id aIdlhG479Xrm0aIdmhM7CF; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:39:06 +0000 X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0;st=legit To:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com From: Karl Dahlke Reply-to: Karl Dahlke References: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E) Subject: [edbrowse-dev] faux stepping Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:39:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20190510073905.eklhad@comcast.net> X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@edbrowse.org List-Id: Edbrowse Development List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=nextpart-eb-133871 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --nextpart-eb-133871 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well my first thought is that there are a million instructions to step = through before you get to the one you want, or before something = interesting happens, so you would tear your hair out in frustration before then. My second thought is, I did this for some reason, and a million alerts flowing by for you to look at manually would be = just as frustrating as a million breakpoints, so maybe there aren't a million, maybe there are only a thousand and = it's manageable. Third thought; if you want to implement uvw =3D bp, injecting = breakpoint instead of alert, that's fine with me. I imagine it would be a copy of the trace code but injecting something = different. I'm working on some other things but they don't touch startwindow.js. You probably want to have a local snapshot to work with, already = deminimized, so the line numbers mean something, then browse again with uvw =3D bp. Is there something specific you're trying to track down? I'm over here messing with the possibility of downloading all the js = files and css files in parallel in the background, and not really sure if it's a good idea anyways, whether the performance improvements (if any) are worth the increase in = code complexity. Trouble is, there's no way to know except to implement it an find out. Karl Dahlke --nextpart-eb-133871--