From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (75-164-228-9.ptld.qwest.net [75.164.228.9]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF59A7ABC3 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Brannon To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com References: <20150310234817.eklhad@comcast.net> <20150411141100.GB9150@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:46:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150411141100.GB9150@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> (Adam Thompson's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:11:00 +0100") Message-ID: <871tjqafj4.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Short Timers X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:47:51 -0000 Adam Thompson writes: >> > Or actually thinking of a design which works rather than just dismissing the > idea as impossible. Sorry, I think you're picking up on my cynicism. I assure you, I wasn't always this way. I got my first net account back in 1993. For me, that was something of a golden age, because everything on the Internet was more or less accessible. But after '97 or so, it seems like I've had to fight one accessibility battle after the other, and it has worn me down. So yeah, I suppose I need to apologize for being as jaded as I am. > The fact is that I don't run a GUI by preference (and because Linux desktop > accessibility is fairly aweful unless you do some significant tinkering from > what I've seen) Yes, true. What I do is run chrome with chromevox under a lightweight window manager. It works for me, and I avoid the desktop environments. > Anyway, as for the design; > basically we need to have DOM and JS in separate processes, > which can then be used to render the buffer on a user command. That does sound workable! I don't see any flaws in the basic concept. -- Chris