From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (67-5-177-213.ptld.qwest.net [67.5.177.213]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78E8621DE01; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:53:30 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brannon To: Karl Dahlke Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com References: <20151214153200.GA3088@acer.attlocal.net> <87wpsgnbzg.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> <20151114131201.eklhad@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:55:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20151114131201.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of "Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:12:01 -0500") Message-ID: <87d1u8mhtt.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] edbrowse and edbrowse-js not communicating X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 04:53:30 -0000 Karl Dahlke writes: > is it possible to have edbrowse check at run time > whether it has the correct and latest tidy, and issue a warning message if it does not? Here's the problem. The old tidy code defined tidyReleaseDate. tidy-html5 defines tidyLibraryVersion and tidyReleaseDate, but they claim that tidyReleaseDate is deprecated. So I don't know how long that will be available. For now, tidy-html5 is a drop-in replacement for the original tidy, so I suppose I could look at tidyReleaseDate to determine whether we're using old tidy code. A better solution would be to check at build time. That's quite doable with cmake, and I'm starting to get a handle on how to use it, so maybe that's the way to go. That begs a question. At some point, should we consider deprecating all of our makefiles? -- Chris