From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chris@the-brannons.com>
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:4b:a4d8:4b00:12bf:48ff:fe7c:5584])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D95F77894
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:25:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
References: <20140030100901.eklhad@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:24:40 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20140030100901.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of
 "Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:09:01 -0500")
Message-ID: <87iot1lcg7.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] indenting
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:25:04 -0000

I don't care at all.  Whatever the agreed-upon style happens to be, I'll
stick to it.  I have no problem with using the indent script from the
kernel source.

> Also I wonder if we should not run eb.h through such a script.

Maybe not.  I won't be surprised if the indentation on struct
declarations gets out of sync at some point, but this file doesn't
change all that much.

-- Chris