From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:b8:64f8:b000::51d2:176e]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4DF177DE5 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 08:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Brannon To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com References: <20170808183915.eklhad@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 08:27:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170808183915.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of "Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:39:15 -0400") Message-ID: <87k216a80l.fsf@prgmr.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Third X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:25:33 -0000 Karl Dahlke writes: > As we accumulate ever more third party js code, should we keep stuffing it into startwindow.js, > as we have done with the css parser and querySelectorAll, > or should we put it all in third.js? > The latter offers almost no advantage, except for its organization: Splitting it out is probably a good idea, just for the organization. -- Chris