From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chris@the-brannons.com>
Received: from localhost (71-38-154-164.ptld.qwest.net [71.38.154.164])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB92477ACF
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Tue,  5 Aug 2014 04:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
References: <20140705071103.eklhad@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:28:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20140705071103.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of
 "Tue, 05 Aug 2014 07:11:03 -0400")
Message-ID: <87tx5rkweh.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Issues reported by Clang static analyzer
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:29:42 -0000

Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net> writes:

> I think it was fine the way it was, really,
> would only cause trouble on a situation that I know can never occur,

Yes, I'm all for fixing these, even when we can prove that they're
spurious.  I'm happy to work on more of them.

Oh, and Paul asked which method was best for sending contributions to
edbrowse.  Patches to the list are the best, so that either Karl, Adam,
or myself can review them.

Thanks,
-- Chris