From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:4b:a4d8:4b00:12bf:48ff:fe7c:5584]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C96B78496 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:10:49 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brannon To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com References: <20140115032357.eklhad@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:10:02 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20140115032357.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of "Sat, 15 Feb 2014 03:23:57 -0500") Message-ID: <87txc09zud.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] %zu X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:10:49 -0000 > My first question is whether %zu is standard wherever we might reasonably > expect to port edbrowse. %z is defined in C99, so if the system library is C99 compliant, it is available. Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and MacOSX all support it. It should be fine for us. -- Chris