From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:4b:a4ef:2500:12bf:48ff:fe7c:5584]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25A1E77889 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:17:42 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brannon To: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com References: <20140008060551.eklhad@comcast.net> <20140108124047.GB3935@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> <87y52iuwej.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> <20140114212737.GC31480@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:17:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20140114212737.GC31480@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> (Adam Thompson's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:27:37 +0000") Message-ID: <87txd6us1n.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] js progress update X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:17:42 -0000 Adam Thompson writes: > We also need to work out a good way of testing for memory leaks, > I was thinking of running under valgrind for extended periods of web browsing. It's a good idea. I found lots of memory leaks this way in the past, along with a couple memory corruption bugs. Browsing under valgrind is a little more sluggish, as one would expect, but it isn't terrible by any means. -- Chris