From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chris@the-brannons.com>
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2602:4b:a4e7:4600:12bf:48ff:fe7c:5584])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A972D77F9B
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
References: <20140210082719.eklhad@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:47:45 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20140210082719.eklhad@comcast.net> (Karl Dahlke's message of
 "Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:27:19 -0400")
Message-ID: <87zjkwx2wu.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Setters and Post Scan
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:49:06 -0000

Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net> writes:

> The fact that js could completely rearrange the page,
> makes it likely that we will move away from setters and towards
> a post scan for these things.

I think so.  I don't think it would really be feasible to handle a fully
dynamic page in setters.  How expensive is this going to be in terms of
runtime?

-- Chris