From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60])
	by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C71777884
	for <edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp
X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com
Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.57.137.251])
	(Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp)
	by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21C0B3802A7
	for <edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost)
	by carhart.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6KKRF6Y231344
	for <edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:27:16 -0700
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Carhart <kevin@carhart.net>
To: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: [edbrowse-dev] demin and distributions (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907201325230.193917@carhart.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@edbrowse.org
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.edbrowse.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907201325232.193917@carhart.net>


I would say so, if 500k is not trivial and the users won't need it.

> Should we use another variaable EBDEMIN to include the demiinimizing 
feature?