From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8E977E69 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 17:48:45 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from phoenix.carhart.net (unknown [99.57.137.251]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3934F52D; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 17:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.carhart.net (carhart.net [127.0.0.1]) by phoenix.carhart.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x890mhR6084152; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 17:48:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by phoenix.carhart.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x890mhBn084149; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 17:48:43 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: phoenix.carhart.net: kevin owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 17:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart X-X-Sender: kevin@phoenix To: Karl Dahlke cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [edbrowse-dev] GCS and never-referenced style props In-Reply-To: <20190808195047.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20190808195047.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@edbrowse.org List-Id: Edbrowse Development List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Thanks, 1298 looks like the place. > Is there any spec on this or are we just winging it? Well, the Mozilla CSS reference lists the transition properties among their basic "here are the CSS properties" A-Z list, but we can just implement a few, https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference On Sun, 8 Sep 2019, Karl Dahlke wrote: > Is this like what I have at startwindow.js line 1298? > I added that because of an acid test but there might be others. > I hope not "hundreds". > If there are a lot we should think about putting them in the prototype, in a clever way, maybe. > CSSStyleDeclaration.prototype.transitionDelay = ""; > Such could be overwritten per style object of course, but we'd have to be careful. > Is there any spec on this or are we just winging it? > > Karl Dahlke >