From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6042B77ADC for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 02:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F86C20F3A; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:58:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftml.net; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=iXrbTzgln8n8pa0YsBdCQW0 UFGc=; b=V5fSdzR8NLZVMirUwLMdiEkn9oMAWEvy+7hoIV7kxRcF9gaX6Qz54pL g8swrvYiwUSIS19pWF9NEEO5modrvh35Y5QrSurSou54qtJNSxDY6nJCXBeBCh1V ZXtDPgTmdGmH8ST3xQOdEz4YBBnNu2YrFKTyW75yKH8FiL6eINNQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh= iXrbTzgln8n8pa0YsBdCQW0UFGc=; b=DXbC52ha7uZtd/9YwYBnIuQkZQTU7vtb LoCWjeEYIZX8kCrOm46tegaLlC9KDt2jR9EvnzlGlnYj+LOZ+kZJleD7BxYZQvKm 1U5RrdBk39tBTWNVUvtXd4R1WGTCwe9WkatpsmFZgw9aFaiZOM/tw2LdLIR1nWKz JNhzfRnCkuQ= X-Sasl-enc: QxjwvARXW1eMMYNH5ezUSJVdCgCSCpK/yJfvAz2erN1s 1403344729 Received: from acer (unknown [64.65.238.242]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 488F96800EC; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:58:45 -0400 From: Charles Hallenbeck X-X-Sender: chuckh@localhost.localdomain To: Kevin Carhart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20140407185427.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] about compiling 3.5.1 X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 09:59:09 -0000 Kevin, My archlinux distro provides a js24 package that works with edbrowse 3.5.1, as does Fedora and a growing list of other distros. Debian's release does not yet work with edbrowse however. The team here mostly worked with the mozjs24 from Mozilla until the supported packages came along. I don't recall having difficulties compiling the Mozilla release, but the others can be more helpful, I'm sjre. Chuck On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Kevin Carhart wrote: > > Hi all > > Wow, compiling the mozjs-24 has way more to it than in the past. I'm finally > trying to do this. Lots of weird errors so far. Has anyone had difficulties > with the python requirements? What do they need all of this python for? Oh > well.. I guess I was spoiled by using old versions for a long time. > > If I want to try out things like parentNodes and attachEvent(), is 3.5.1 the > earliest version where these are found? In other words, I have to go to > mozjs-24 to get these js features? Or could I decouple these two things, give > edbrowse a slightly older js but still be able to use the latest edbrowse? > > I'm on a 32-bit CentOS. I haven't been able to find mozjs-24 in package form, > either from yum or hunting around the rpm search engines so I have to compile. > I don't really know how out of date I am. Is 32-bit still OK or is it very > ill-advised? ... if you happen to know. > > thank you! > Kevin > > > > > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Karl Dahlke wrote: > > > > Hello - I am Kevin - I appreciate being able to lurk on the list > > > > Please continue to read and post, it is quite helpful, > > and perhaps you will join the development team if you find time. > > > > You may want to get and use 3.5.1, > > even though that is not an official version release yet. > > A lot of changes there; the required change of supporting mozjs 24, but also > > new features. > > One is attachEvent(), which you aluded to in your post. > > This is plain js, not jquery, but jquery may well use this feature > > to atttach events to actions. > > So pages that would attach a javascript function to a click or a load > > will now do something whereas they did nothing before. > > > > parentNode is also new; > > I try to connect each node to its parent when created. > > This is relevat to your description of the document tree, > > and yes web js uses and expects and even modifies this tree all over the > > place; > > we have to support it! > > If I am doing the parentnode properly, it would not be too hard > > to add in the reverse logic to build the child node links. > > Then write the functions to add new nodes > > into the tree dynamically. > > This is all moving forward, I think, > > in the right direction, but slowly, > > as it's just a couple of volunteers with some spare time. > > Let me know if you can get, build, and use the latest, > > and if you have further thoughts on design and development. > > > > Karl Dahlke > > _______________________________________________ > > Edbrowse-dev mailing list > > Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com > > http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev > > > > -------- > Kevin Carhart * 415 225 5306 * The Ten Ninety Nihilists > _______________________________________________ > Edbrowse-dev mailing list > Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com > http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev > -- Chuck in Ghent, northeast of Hudson on the Hudson.