And a note to Adam, we've hashed this patch out offlist, but if you have 
any critiques on this, please fire away.  It's just a few lines and 
straightforward, but as a patch-submission newbie I can use the 
multifaceted scrutiny, and would like to know what you think.

Thanks
Kevin


On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Karl Dahlke wrote:

> We stand on the edge of pushing a change that will require tidy5.
> It's cautious, doesn't do anything except run the html through tidy,
> in parallel with everything else we are doing,
> then free the tidy tree when the window is freed.
> Just to get us started, to make sure tidy doesn't seg fault etc.
> But it will change the way edbrowse is built.
> We now need another library etc.
> Should we, and I kinda think we should, stamp another version, 3.5.4.2,
> before we jump into the tidy pool?
> Some work has been done since 3.5.4.1, some bug fixes, some cosmetics,
> and the framework for imap, including a simple move delete interface.
> Chris before you push Kevin's tidy patch, maybe stamp 3.5.4.2.
>
> After we are using tidy to parse html,
> and I hope this isn't a long time coming, we may want to jump up to 3.6.
>
> Karl Dahlke
> _______________________________________________
> Edbrowse-dev mailing list
> Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
> http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
>

--------
Kevin Carhart * 415 225 5306 * The Ten Ninety Nihilists