From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBB47890C for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:36:09 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 29FEE401005; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7SMcHba014602; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:38:18 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id t7SMcHps014599; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:38:17 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:38:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Chris Brannon cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <874mjjw00k.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <874mjjw00k.fsf@mushroom.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] tidy tree X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:36:09 -0000 Hi Chris No problem. Echoing the text at a higher db level is a good idea. I'll go add that to db6 right now if I can figure it out swiftly and then send it to you. I did not write very much. I grabbed existing work, such as this, so thank you Suman Srinivasan. http://sumancolumbia.blogspot.com/2006/03/parsing-html-using-tidy-and-tidylib.html Kevin On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Chris Brannon wrote: > Kevin Carhart writes: > >> Here is what I have right now. >> >> The node name is shown. >> The number in parentheses is the number of levels of nesting. >> After each node is each attribute name-value pair. >> What else? > > That's very awesome! Sorry, I must have missed seeing that you had started > on this. The only thing I might add is perhaps a display of the > contents of text nodes. Or at least the length of the underlying > string? On the other hand, maybe that's a little too much noise? > Perhaps we could show that on higher debug levels? > > -- Chris > -------- Kevin Carhart * 415 225 5306 * The Ten Ninety Nihilists