From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5543479046 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:00:23 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 29C98400B2E; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBI00SOl014576; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:00:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id tBI00RwD014556; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:00:28 -0800 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:00:27 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20151117171357.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20151217134608.GA4216@acer.attlocal.net> <20151117171357.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] masking of passwords X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:23 -0000 On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Karl Dahlke wrote: >> But what if there was an invisible mode? > > Well selfishly, I don't have a screen, so I don't care. > But seriously... I know, but ... we could get a burst of popularity from the Windows port, and those users could tend to have a monitor, perhaps. > This is really a nontrivial effort. Sure I can suppress echo at the tty, Yeah. Hmmmmmmmmmmm. Kevin