From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6AD789BD for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:19:59 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0EF59400A19; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u2O7KDit011936; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:20:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id u2O7KDdR011907; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:20:13 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: edbrowse-dev@the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20160223211255.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20160223211255.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] tales from the front X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:19:59 -0000 [ Karl said, that he can't read the messages in the thread about the 348 issue, probably because of the 348 issue itself. CCing the list just for fun.] > The great irony is, I can't read any messages in this thread, > probably because of the 348 issue. > Hi Karl Yes, those kinds of two-level things are real, and a big mess. I had a job in eDiscovery, in other words, gathering documents in the discovery phase of trials. So I'm scripting HTTP to gather hundreds of pages from an intranet wiki, the topic of which ITSELF happens to be about software engineering and web pages. There was absolutely no way to distinguish things in markup that I was supposed to identify and switch on, versus inline code examples written by engineers demonstrating concepts to each other, and that happened to be of the same thing! I tried to tell my boss what I was up against and didn't get too far.