From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0D87962B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE451400124; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5R6dojZ032260; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:39:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id u5R6dnk3032253; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:39:50 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:39:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20160523124137.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20160523124137.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] questions about new finds X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:38:19 -0000 Thanks for the notes on my new finds. I checked up on a couple of these. > (1) Do you mean in the html text or createElement("modernizer")? > Those are radically different issues. > The first is up to tidy, and out of our hands. Aha,so it actually is createElement. The Amazon homepage says things like: ...r.createElement("video").... and ...r.createElement("canvas")... and then from tagFromJavaVar2, edbrowse can't find those strings in availableTags, and then reports: cannot create tag node video cannot create tag node canvas And on item 3, about the setTimeout and badarg: > Hint: jseng_moz.cpp line 2030, the 2 forces exactly 2 args. > I think. You might have to change it to 0 for vararg then check > arg counts down the line. Aha, I wonder if that was the missing link when I was getting crashes. Because it now didn't adhere to the spec. That could be it! Kevin