From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDD9795B7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:56:25 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9809F400EBE; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5UMw2xp001948; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id u5UMw2aR001941; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20160530120010.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20160529212929.kevin@carhart.net > <20160530120010.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] patch remarks X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 22:56:25 -0000 > Well seems reasonable enough so I pushed it, > plus the substr correction you mentioned. Thanks Karl! > Commenting out iframe makes me a little nervous, > it fixes some pages that crashed but mightit also break some pages > that use to work?? I know. I agree... it might break some pages that used to work, so it probably should get uncommented again right away. It's like a working demo, which is now there for posterity in version control with a unique hash and timestamp, so it will be downloadable even when we supercede it with more commits. Maybe another way of accomplishing this would have been to fork the edbrowse code so that it is sitting under kcarhart instead of CMB, commit the bundle of changes and say "would you please compile this in a side folder marked 'experiment' and try it out? If I do these couple of weird things that are way out on a limb, as well as these other ten bits of implementation that I can justify, we can get this whole round trip where several moving parts of the program work together and a potentially common page behavior works which doesn't otherwise." It's food for thought, in the form of a compileable codebase rather than just describing. It kind of plays on the lovely fact that edbrowse is so light, you can copy around the entire thing just to illustrate a point, and it doesn't take prohibitive time to compile or download. Kevin