From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9EA777DC4 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:24:03 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 701D2419 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v0T2OprQ030484 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:24:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v0T2OpfZ030481 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:24:51 -0800 Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:24:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170027050941.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170026211901.eklhad@comcast.net> <20170027050941.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Finding cycles in the tree X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 02:24:04 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote: >> What do you think about trying to isolate the cause by going into the > > I don't think it would tell us anything. This problem popped up because > we got enough of the js working to move forward, and make the links, > hopefully correct.) It's like turning on the light and seeing the mess. Ahh yes, I take your point on that. This has happened to me quite a bit. You pore over problem 1, fix it, and CONGRATULATIONS! Your reward is..... ........ problem 2! A bigger mess. So it's a good thing, it just doesn't feel like one. You have to bear in mind that the whole thing was masked out up until that point and you have now revealed it, not just get frustrated by problem 2.