From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDC1791FB for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B48BD2D8; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v65LD4tL003286; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:13:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v65LD3Qt003279; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:13:04 -0700 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170605095053.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170605095053.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] obj = new Foo() X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:12:30 -0000 I am agnostic. I remember the cumbersome embedding like > > js_rooted_value val = js_execute("new TextNode('elephant')"); > js_rooted_object my_text_object = js_value_to_object(val); > // Thus capturing the instantiated object. >>From the xhr routine and other routines. But I tend to mostly work on DOM, so it doesn't matter as far as I am concerned. I doubt we would want to go back to moz. Maybe one danger that comes to mind is that 'duktape' becomes a ghost town. I notice they have thriving and frequent commits right now: 15 days ago, 6 days ago, 2 months ago. It's actively maintained right now, but this can change. However, I don't think my concern is any worse than the chaos of Mozilla yanking people around with changes. Kevin PS Welcome Dominique. Given your expertise it seems like you will come up with some useful contributions, if you have time. I'm in favor of masking out passwords. It seems non standard not to do it, and I always worried about someone peeking over the user's shoulder.