From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.61; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D6C77DE5 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:01:37 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0AE9D136 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v7DN1dI5006342 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:01:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v7DN1cgQ006336 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:01:39 -0700 Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:01:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170713174445.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170713073152.eklhad@comcast.net> <20170713174445.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] jspool X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 23:01:37 -0000 Is this a good time to have a thread about the more specific end of things, or is there still so much going on with the basic architecture that it's premature? I have built the latest a few times and pulled up acid3.acidtests.org. There are a bunch of things we could talk about. In order to take it from the top, I tried test #0. (The tests are numbered 1 to 100, but there is also a zero.) Test #0 actually does not use the iframes, but it does use CSS selectors. So we could discuss #0, or leap ahead to one of the tests that uses the new iframe support but still doesn't pass, or wait a while. Kevin On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote: > I think we have a good foundation now - so over the next couple months I hope we can get a lot more sites working, either by plowing through acid tests methodically, or fixing individual sites that people want. > > Karl Dahlke > -------- Kevin Carhart * 415 225 5306 * The Ten Ninety Nihilists