From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.60; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2559477C83 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:38:49 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC7491F7; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v7F5cs0Y028854; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:38:54 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v7F5cr3v028850; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:38:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:38:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke , Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170715003928.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170713214236.kevin@carhart.net > <20170715003928.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] defaultView and getComputedStyle patch X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 05:38:50 -0000 I agree! Sorry, I was being sort of rhetorical! I should have said, it's a good idea because blah blah, CSSStyleDeclaration is a superset of style so it's good on all cylinders. Where does it live, and how should we do it? Is it JS, or is it back in decorate? If you have time and stamina, I would like to keep going from this, to what is actually going wrong when it goes through the motions in test zero. It can't be that difficult. It is just some DOM maneuvers, but I think I have noticed something wrong with which scripts are found in head, or body. It's great that we're banging this out. Could you run those first three or four lines in case something will leap out at you that doesn't leap out at me? On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote: >> Does CSSStyleDeclaration get you something that style does not? > > Sure. All the methods of CSSStyleDeclaration. > Like if js ever calls > some_element.style.getPropertyValue("foo"); > Etc. > > Karl Dahlke > -------- Kevin Carhart * 415 225 5306 * The Ten Ninety Nihilists